Aug. 9, 2023
How to keep going in the face of rejection
Rejection is a natural part of a clinician researcher's journey. Rejection hurts, but it can be transformed into a growth opportunity. In this episode we review the following 4 strategies for dealing with rejection.
- Start with a research project you really care about.
- Reframe the way you think about rejection.
- Create multiple prototypes (several grants/manuscripts).
- Before rejection comes, have a plan for how you will respond.
1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:05,860
Welcome to the Clinician Researcher podcast, where academic clinicians learn the skills
2
00:00:05,860 --> 00:00:11,260
to build their own research program, whether or not they have a mentor.
3
00:00:11,260 --> 00:00:17,340
As clinicians, we spend a decade or more as trainees learning to take care of patients.
4
00:00:17,340 --> 00:00:22,380
When we finally start our careers, we want to build research programs, but then we find
5
00:00:22,380 --> 00:00:27,780
that our years of clinical training did not adequately prepare us to lead our research
6
00:00:27,780 --> 00:00:29,180
program.
7
00:00:29,180 --> 00:00:35,480
Through no fault of our own, we struggle to find mentors, and when we can't, we quit.
8
00:00:35,480 --> 00:00:40,580
However, clinicians hold the keys to the greatest research breakthroughs.
9
00:00:40,580 --> 00:00:46,200
For this reason, the Clinician Researcher podcast exists to give academic clinicians
10
00:00:46,200 --> 00:00:51,800
the tools to build their own research program, whether or not they have a mentor.
11
00:00:51,800 --> 00:01:01,180
Now introducing your host, Toyosi Onwuemene.
12
00:01:01,180 --> 00:01:04,100
Welcome to today's episode of the Clinician Researcher podcast.
13
00:01:04,100 --> 00:01:08,940
I'm your host, Toyosi Onwuemene, and it is a pleasure to be talking with you today.
14
00:01:08,940 --> 00:01:13,220
So today we're going to be talking about how to keep going in the face of rejection.
15
00:01:13,220 --> 00:01:14,220
Ugh, rejection.
16
00:01:14,220 --> 00:01:19,900
Yes, we're going to be talking about how to keep going in the face of rejection.
17
00:01:19,900 --> 00:01:24,060
And one thing I want to invite you to do is if you are interested, please sign up on our
18
00:01:24,060 --> 00:01:28,820
website for more information about our coaching programs.
19
00:01:28,820 --> 00:01:31,540
That is ClinicianResearcherpodcast.com.
20
00:01:31,540 --> 00:01:36,220
Academic Negotiation Academy will be enrolling its next cohort soon.
21
00:01:36,220 --> 00:01:40,460
Sign up to get on the wait list at ClinicianResearcherpodcast.com.
22
00:01:40,460 --> 00:01:42,260
All right.
23
00:01:42,260 --> 00:01:45,740
I am talking today about how to keep going in the face of rejection.
24
00:01:45,740 --> 00:01:51,460
And you know, I will tell you that no one prepared me for the rejection that was coming
25
00:01:51,460 --> 00:01:53,700
in academic medicine.
26
00:01:53,700 --> 00:01:55,980
And there is a ton of rejection.
27
00:01:55,980 --> 00:01:58,980
Oh my goodness, so much rejection.
28
00:01:58,980 --> 00:02:04,660
You get rejected in your grant submission to get rejected in your manuscript submissions.
29
00:02:04,660 --> 00:02:07,020
There's a lot of rejection.
30
00:02:07,020 --> 00:02:10,380
And many times that can feel very personal.
31
00:02:10,380 --> 00:02:14,780
And it's hard to separate yourself from all that rejection.
32
00:02:14,780 --> 00:02:19,340
So when I recently submitted a grant, I was so pumped about this grant.
33
00:02:19,340 --> 00:02:23,540
I mean, it was maybe one of the best applications I had ever written.
34
00:02:23,540 --> 00:02:25,140
We had time.
35
00:02:25,140 --> 00:02:29,780
I had submitted this application as an MPI application.
36
00:02:29,780 --> 00:02:32,980
So I had another PI who was equally invested.
37
00:02:32,980 --> 00:02:36,580
And it was just such a wonderful writing collaboration.
38
00:02:36,580 --> 00:02:42,340
The best grant I've ever written, just considering all the energy and just it was good.
39
00:02:42,340 --> 00:02:43,340
It was good grant.
40
00:02:43,340 --> 00:02:44,340
It was good.
41
00:02:44,340 --> 00:02:48,220
And so I was so sure that this grant would be funded.
42
00:02:48,220 --> 00:02:49,220
I was so sure.
43
00:02:49,220 --> 00:02:51,460
Like, no, grants are not to be funded the first time.
44
00:02:51,460 --> 00:02:53,100
It was like, this one's going to be.
45
00:02:53,100 --> 00:02:58,860
And even if it's not funded, it's going to score really, really well.
46
00:02:58,860 --> 00:03:00,900
And so imagine my surprise.
47
00:03:00,900 --> 00:03:05,420
And really, I was shocked when it came back as not discussed.
48
00:03:05,420 --> 00:03:06,420
Shock, shock.
49
00:03:06,420 --> 00:03:08,380
I mean, I don't know.
50
00:03:08,380 --> 00:03:10,380
You have enough grants that are not discussed.
51
00:03:10,380 --> 00:03:12,540
You're not really shocked, shocked anymore.
52
00:03:12,540 --> 00:03:14,620
It's like, oh, that happened again.
53
00:03:14,620 --> 00:03:16,100
But I was surprised at this one.
54
00:03:16,100 --> 00:03:19,420
And it did kind of it was like a sucker punch to the stomach.
55
00:03:19,420 --> 00:03:24,260
This one took me a little bit to think about to think about going back and looking at it.
56
00:03:24,260 --> 00:03:29,780
And actually, when you first find out that the grant is not discussed, you don't necessarily
57
00:03:29,780 --> 00:03:32,380
have the opportunity to go find out what the summary statements are.
58
00:03:32,380 --> 00:03:35,100
So it takes a couple of weeks.
59
00:03:35,100 --> 00:03:38,100
Anyway, it took a couple of weeks.
60
00:03:38,100 --> 00:03:42,540
And by then, you already know that the grant is not going to be funded.
61
00:03:42,540 --> 00:03:45,660
So by the time the summary statement comes, to some extent, you're prepared.
62
00:03:45,660 --> 00:03:49,260
But even then, you're still not prepared because you're like, I don't want to look at this.
63
00:03:49,260 --> 00:03:50,260
But I did look at it.
64
00:03:50,260 --> 00:03:54,540
And I will tell you, it is the first time I read a summary statement.
65
00:03:54,540 --> 00:03:58,500
And at the end of it, I was like, oh, OK, is that what you need?
66
00:03:58,500 --> 00:04:00,300
OK, bring it on.
67
00:04:00,300 --> 00:04:03,980
This is going to be good.
68
00:04:03,980 --> 00:04:06,340
It was just an opportunity.
69
00:04:06,340 --> 00:04:11,820
And at the end of it, I think why I was so pumped by reading that summary statement is
70
00:04:11,820 --> 00:04:14,100
that we wrote a grant we really wanted to do.
71
00:04:14,100 --> 00:04:17,100
We wrote a grant we were super excited about.
72
00:04:17,100 --> 00:04:19,260
And it was such a wonderful writing experience.
73
00:04:19,260 --> 00:04:23,780
And so to read the summary statement and realize that, you know what?
74
00:04:23,780 --> 00:04:26,160
This project is still pretty awesome.
75
00:04:26,160 --> 00:04:30,500
And these are the things that are recommended to get the project to funding.
76
00:04:30,500 --> 00:04:32,860
OK, we can do that.
77
00:04:32,860 --> 00:04:38,980
And it's just the sense of the value of the work is such that it's not going to stop.
78
00:04:38,980 --> 00:04:41,820
We're going to find a way to move it forward.
79
00:04:41,820 --> 00:04:45,500
We are going to find a way to move it forward because we are committed to the work, because
80
00:04:45,500 --> 00:04:50,540
the work is important and it needs to see the light of day.
81
00:04:50,540 --> 00:04:55,980
And it's just such a wonderful place to be, I think, from just the perspective of what
82
00:04:55,980 --> 00:04:58,260
are you writing that ignites your fire?
83
00:04:58,260 --> 00:05:02,420
What are you writing about that keeps you going?
84
00:05:02,420 --> 00:05:06,340
And I think that's probably what I'm talking about today is how do you keep going in the
85
00:05:06,340 --> 00:05:13,180
face of rejection and what are some of the ways that you can think about rejection and
86
00:05:13,180 --> 00:05:16,400
how do you rejection proof your experience?
87
00:05:16,400 --> 00:05:19,180
So I'm not saying I'm taking away rejections.
88
00:05:19,180 --> 00:05:25,580
I'm saying how do you take those rejections and make them into more than just rejection?
89
00:05:25,580 --> 00:05:30,580
So today I'm talking about four things to think about in fortifying yourself against
90
00:05:30,580 --> 00:05:31,580
rejection.
91
00:05:31,580 --> 00:05:38,060
So number one is start with a project.
92
00:05:38,060 --> 00:05:41,500
So there's a book by Simon Sinek that says start with why.
93
00:05:41,500 --> 00:05:45,860
And if I wasn't saying start with a project, I would say start with why.
94
00:05:45,860 --> 00:05:51,140
Many times when we are coming to our careers as clinician researchers, we are kind of starting
95
00:05:51,140 --> 00:05:54,700
off on the project that was handed to us.
96
00:05:54,700 --> 00:06:00,540
And there's value in that because, again, we are thinking about research training.
97
00:06:00,540 --> 00:06:02,780
It takes time to do research training.
98
00:06:02,780 --> 00:06:07,540
And over the course of PhD training, people start from where they were just contributing
99
00:06:07,540 --> 00:06:12,740
to a project to where they're actually taking pieces of projects and creating their own
100
00:06:12,740 --> 00:06:17,620
projects out of that to where they are actually leading their own projects.
101
00:06:17,620 --> 00:06:20,940
And so when you think about clinicians doing research, in a way, you're trying to fast
102
00:06:20,940 --> 00:06:23,340
track and accelerate the process.
103
00:06:23,340 --> 00:06:27,420
So you don't necessarily start out with your own project.
104
00:06:27,420 --> 00:06:31,580
You're looking to see is there a mentor who's already working on a project and I can get
105
00:06:31,580 --> 00:06:32,580
skills that I need.
106
00:06:32,580 --> 00:06:34,820
So there's definitely the elements of that.
107
00:06:34,820 --> 00:06:39,060
But as you start to think about leading your own research program, and I would argue that
108
00:06:39,060 --> 00:06:44,660
when you are a fellow making that transition, to really start thinking about what do I care
109
00:06:44,660 --> 00:06:45,660
about?
110
00:06:45,660 --> 00:06:47,940
What do I really, really care about?
111
00:06:47,940 --> 00:06:53,040
And to focus on getting involved in projects you really, really care about that you see
112
00:06:53,040 --> 00:06:58,140
yourself continue projects that really energize you.
113
00:06:58,140 --> 00:07:03,800
And it's important because there are two pieces I think about in making and doing the training
114
00:07:03,800 --> 00:07:09,860
or in making the transition from clinician to researcher to leader of a program is number
115
00:07:09,860 --> 00:07:15,780
one, you do need to learn how to do you need to learn techniques, but you learn how to
116
00:07:15,780 --> 00:07:21,740
do not so that you keep doing, but so that you are able to supervise people who do because
117
00:07:21,740 --> 00:07:27,920
as a clinician, you are a leader and your job ultimately is not to continue to do things
118
00:07:27,920 --> 00:07:28,920
for yourself.
119
00:07:28,920 --> 00:07:35,340
Your job ultimately is to lead people to do the work of your research program.
120
00:07:35,340 --> 00:07:40,780
And so it's important, I think, to separate the doing of the research from the leading
121
00:07:40,780 --> 00:07:41,780
of the research.
122
00:07:41,780 --> 00:07:43,860
So there are two components to the training.
123
00:07:43,860 --> 00:07:44,860
Number one is the doing.
124
00:07:44,860 --> 00:07:50,180
Number two is the leading of the doers because your job and actually maybe I would argue
125
00:07:50,180 --> 00:07:54,180
that you're leading the doers and ultimately you lead thinkers as well.
126
00:07:54,180 --> 00:08:00,580
Your value to your research program leadership is your thought, is the way you think.
127
00:08:00,580 --> 00:08:06,460
This is how we can take this huge complex problem and boil it down into a research question
128
00:08:06,460 --> 00:08:07,460
that can be answered.
129
00:08:07,460 --> 00:08:12,280
And these are the set of experiments that allow us to answer the question, or these
130
00:08:12,280 --> 00:08:16,400
are the set of analyses that allow us to answer the question.
131
00:08:16,400 --> 00:08:23,220
And then you get your team to do the analyses to answer the question, or to do the experiments
132
00:08:23,220 --> 00:08:24,860
that answer the question.
133
00:08:24,860 --> 00:08:28,220
Your thought leadership is so key.
134
00:08:28,220 --> 00:08:36,460
And so when you are thinking about your experiences for training, think about how do I get the
135
00:08:36,460 --> 00:08:38,180
thought leadership?
136
00:08:38,180 --> 00:08:41,580
How do I get the thought patterns that allow me to do this well?
137
00:08:41,580 --> 00:08:46,140
And so you think about your projects in terms of what skill is this bringing me?
138
00:08:46,140 --> 00:08:52,380
Is it giving me the skill to do, which is fine, but ultimately the goal is not to get
139
00:08:52,380 --> 00:08:57,260
good at doing, your goal is to get good at leading the people who do.
140
00:08:57,260 --> 00:09:01,980
And you get good at leading the people who do things by being able to think well.
141
00:09:01,980 --> 00:09:06,460
And so yes, sometimes it's like, well, but I have to teach the people who do things.
142
00:09:06,460 --> 00:09:12,060
I would say that think about how do you structure your research programs such that you're working
143
00:09:12,060 --> 00:09:15,220
with people who already know how to do these things.
144
00:09:15,220 --> 00:09:18,860
And sometimes that is about collaborations as well.
145
00:09:18,860 --> 00:09:22,100
Who already has the infrastructure to do what you want to do?
146
00:09:22,100 --> 00:09:26,740
And how can you collaborate with them so that your group can focus on what their area of
147
00:09:26,740 --> 00:09:33,220
expertise is, and you're not necessarily investing all the time trying to learn new techniques
148
00:09:33,220 --> 00:09:34,220
each time.
149
00:09:34,220 --> 00:09:37,980
Anyway, so there are nuances depending on the field of research that you're in.
150
00:09:37,980 --> 00:09:42,380
But you do want to really love what you do.
151
00:09:42,380 --> 00:09:45,200
You want to be invested in the patient population.
152
00:09:45,200 --> 00:09:50,860
You want to know that this work leads to something meaningful to you.
153
00:09:50,860 --> 00:09:53,620
And for different people, that means different things.
154
00:09:53,620 --> 00:09:55,820
So for me, I'm not a basic scientist.
155
00:09:55,820 --> 00:09:58,460
I don't work in a wet lab.
156
00:09:58,460 --> 00:10:04,620
I lead a research team that includes biostatisticians and data analysts.
157
00:10:04,620 --> 00:10:09,900
And we do different work from someone who say at them at the bench.
158
00:10:09,900 --> 00:10:15,740
So maybe taking an example from the bench and thinking about, OK, maybe this person
159
00:10:15,740 --> 00:10:19,580
is doing receptor signaling and this work is so important to them.
160
00:10:19,580 --> 00:10:22,740
And they're like, this receptor signaling work that I'm doing is going to really help
161
00:10:22,740 --> 00:10:27,100
us solve problems in patients who have a certain type of cancer.
162
00:10:27,100 --> 00:10:28,460
And that's their why.
163
00:10:28,460 --> 00:10:31,460
It's like this cancer needs to be cured.
164
00:10:31,460 --> 00:10:34,780
Receptor signaling research allows me to do that.
165
00:10:34,780 --> 00:10:38,940
And it allows me to contribute in this way.
166
00:10:38,940 --> 00:10:44,860
And so for that reason, the research project that they're doing is not about receptors.
167
00:10:44,860 --> 00:10:46,460
It's not about signaling.
168
00:10:46,460 --> 00:10:50,140
It's about the patient at the end that's going to benefit from what is coming out of this
169
00:10:50,140 --> 00:10:51,140
work.
170
00:10:51,140 --> 00:10:52,140
And that's great.
171
00:10:52,140 --> 00:10:53,500
I wouldn't resonate with that.
172
00:10:53,500 --> 00:11:02,000
I resonate with how do we answer clinical questions using big data so that we can have
173
00:11:02,000 --> 00:11:04,020
insights to help many more patients?
174
00:11:04,020 --> 00:11:06,980
I want to be a little bit closer to the patient's population.
175
00:11:06,980 --> 00:11:14,060
And for that reason, the population of patients in whom I am asking questions is so important.
176
00:11:14,060 --> 00:11:19,300
And so you want to make sure that you actually enjoy what you do or that the why is so clear
177
00:11:19,300 --> 00:11:25,820
to you because you know that the work you're doing will be done whether people pay you
178
00:11:25,820 --> 00:11:27,260
to do it or not.
179
00:11:27,260 --> 00:11:29,260
You want to do this work.
180
00:11:29,260 --> 00:11:31,860
In fact, if you could, you would pay to do the work.
181
00:11:31,860 --> 00:11:38,420
And for that reason, you want to make sure that you're doing work that matters so that
182
00:11:38,420 --> 00:11:41,460
when rejection comes, you keep it in perspective.
183
00:11:41,460 --> 00:11:45,220
It's like, okay, it's one rejection, but this work is so important, it still needs to move
184
00:11:45,220 --> 00:11:46,220
forward.
185
00:11:46,220 --> 00:11:49,180
And you don't let rejection stop you from doing the work.
186
00:11:49,180 --> 00:11:52,900
What happens when you do work that you don't care about or work that other people have
187
00:11:52,900 --> 00:11:57,620
asked you to do and you've kind of taken on as your own is that the moment rejection comes,
188
00:11:57,620 --> 00:11:58,620
you're like, you know what?
189
00:11:58,620 --> 00:11:59,620
This sucks.
190
00:11:59,620 --> 00:12:00,620
I quit.
191
00:12:00,620 --> 00:12:01,620
I'm done with this.
192
00:12:01,620 --> 00:12:05,980
And so, you know, when it's work that you value, it's a patient population you absolutely
193
00:12:05,980 --> 00:12:12,540
want to contribute to no matter what, you don't let the rejection stop you in your tracks.
194
00:12:12,540 --> 00:12:15,580
You think about a different way to deal with it.
195
00:12:15,580 --> 00:12:17,340
And so anyway, it starts with why.
196
00:12:17,340 --> 00:12:21,820
It starts with really thinking about the reason for which you're doing the research.
197
00:12:21,820 --> 00:12:26,460
Number two is to reframe the way you think about rejection.
198
00:12:26,460 --> 00:12:33,540
Now, when you say rejection, it just sounds so bad, but what if we thought about rejection
199
00:12:33,540 --> 00:12:36,540
as the failure of a prototype?
200
00:12:36,540 --> 00:12:41,860
We've created a prototype and we've put it out there into the world and someone said,
201
00:12:41,860 --> 00:12:43,700
I don't like this prototype.
202
00:12:43,700 --> 00:12:49,980
Now, all the work that you have put into this prototype is still valuable.
203
00:12:49,980 --> 00:12:56,420
All the experience you had in creating this prototype is still valuable.
204
00:12:56,420 --> 00:12:57,420
You haven't lost any of it.
205
00:12:57,420 --> 00:13:02,820
But what you're going to do is take the prototype, keep the stuff in the prototype that makes
206
00:13:02,820 --> 00:13:06,460
sense and then create the next prototype.
207
00:13:06,460 --> 00:13:15,860
And so when you have something that is rejected, it's rejected right now in its current format,
208
00:13:15,860 --> 00:13:22,300
but how can it be recreated so that it becomes something greater?
209
00:13:22,300 --> 00:13:28,060
For example, you just submitted a grant that was rejected and if you're lucky, if you're
210
00:13:28,060 --> 00:13:31,780
submitting to NIH, you get a summary statement that tells you these are all the things that
211
00:13:31,780 --> 00:13:34,780
we think could be improved about your grant.
212
00:13:34,780 --> 00:13:39,220
Now you never are starting from scratch when you resubmit the grant because there's a lot
213
00:13:39,220 --> 00:13:42,780
of it that's already written and a lot of components that don't necessarily need to
214
00:13:42,780 --> 00:13:46,100
change and then there are components that are going to change.
215
00:13:46,100 --> 00:13:50,460
And even if you're doing an overhaul, there's still a starting point.
216
00:13:50,460 --> 00:13:52,900
You're not starting from a blank page.
217
00:13:52,900 --> 00:13:58,900
And so at the end, if we reframe the way we think about rejection, instead as well, well,
218
00:13:58,900 --> 00:14:04,420
this thing was not acceptable in its current format to somebody else.
219
00:14:04,420 --> 00:14:07,660
You can think about who else might accept it in its current format.
220
00:14:07,660 --> 00:14:10,860
So is there a different audience that might like it?
221
00:14:10,860 --> 00:14:18,620
Or you can think about how do we reformat this thing so that it is now acceptable to
222
00:14:18,620 --> 00:14:21,100
the people that we're sending it to?
223
00:14:21,100 --> 00:14:27,300
And so what you find is over time, rejection of one thing allows you to recreate it in
224
00:14:27,300 --> 00:14:30,740
a way that's now acceptable the second time around.
225
00:14:30,740 --> 00:14:38,460
And so rejection really is a personal thing, or we can make it personal, but really it's
226
00:14:38,460 --> 00:14:41,420
just the prototype was rejected.
227
00:14:41,420 --> 00:14:44,060
This thing that you created was rejected.
228
00:14:44,060 --> 00:14:49,860
How can you recreate it so that it's now acceptable to the people that you're putting out there
229
00:14:49,860 --> 00:14:50,860
to?
230
00:14:50,860 --> 00:14:55,020
So it's either the funders or it's the reviewers on behalf of the funders or the reviewers
231
00:14:55,020 --> 00:14:57,820
on behalf of the journal.
232
00:14:57,820 --> 00:15:00,420
But let's rethink the way we think about rejection.
233
00:15:00,420 --> 00:15:01,660
So it's not personal.
234
00:15:01,660 --> 00:15:07,420
It's not being rejected me, but it's really clearly, okay, they didn't like this prototype.
235
00:15:07,420 --> 00:15:08,420
What do we do about it?
236
00:15:08,420 --> 00:15:14,140
And that's why number three is really thinking about creating multiple prototypes.
237
00:15:14,140 --> 00:15:20,780
So it's like, okay, if you're creating something, you know that the very, very first version
238
00:15:20,780 --> 00:15:22,740
is usually not the best version.
239
00:15:22,740 --> 00:15:27,380
It's very rare that you create something that's the final version.
240
00:15:27,380 --> 00:15:29,540
I have submitted many manuscripts in my lifetime.
241
00:15:29,540 --> 00:15:32,700
Goodness, I feel like that number is at least close to 100.
242
00:15:32,700 --> 00:15:37,780
I mean, I haven't had 100 published, not right now, not at the time of this recording, but
243
00:15:37,780 --> 00:15:40,180
I've submitted a lot.
244
00:15:40,180 --> 00:15:44,580
And sometimes it's resubmitting the same thing across, you know, in different versions across
245
00:15:44,580 --> 00:15:46,500
different platforms.
246
00:15:46,500 --> 00:15:51,820
But ultimately, the first thing is usually not the first thing that's accepted.
247
00:15:51,820 --> 00:15:53,740
I've had one, yes, that's what I was saying.
248
00:15:53,740 --> 00:15:58,260
I was trying to say that I've submitted many things and I've only ever had one manuscript
249
00:15:58,260 --> 00:15:59,660
that was accepted the first time.
250
00:15:59,660 --> 00:16:01,060
And that was a complete shock.
251
00:16:01,060 --> 00:16:03,060
I was like, what?
252
00:16:03,060 --> 00:16:05,460
And in reality, it wasn't the first draft that we submitted.
253
00:16:05,460 --> 00:16:07,580
I mean, this is work that we've been doing for a long time.
254
00:16:07,580 --> 00:16:11,540
We were proud of our work, but we also expected that the reviewers would come back with things
255
00:16:11,540 --> 00:16:12,540
that we needed to change.
256
00:16:12,540 --> 00:16:14,460
So we were surprised it was accepted the first time.
257
00:16:14,460 --> 00:16:16,900
That rarely happens.
258
00:16:16,900 --> 00:16:21,780
But each time you submit, it's one version, right?
259
00:16:21,780 --> 00:16:24,180
And it's not even the version you started with.
260
00:16:24,180 --> 00:16:29,980
And if you get rejection, then you recreate and you resubmit.
261
00:16:29,980 --> 00:16:33,340
So ultimately, you're creating multiple prototypes of the same product.
262
00:16:33,340 --> 00:16:38,380
And each time you create a subsequent prototype, the prototype actually gets better.
263
00:16:38,380 --> 00:16:42,060
And if you think about it, let's think about the iPhone, for example, as an example of
264
00:16:42,060 --> 00:16:43,060
a phone.
265
00:16:43,060 --> 00:16:44,500
This is not a promotion.
266
00:16:44,500 --> 00:16:49,060
But if you go back to the very first iPhone and we still have the very first iPhone, I
267
00:16:49,060 --> 00:16:51,900
mean, it was really cool for its time.
268
00:16:51,900 --> 00:16:56,940
But multiple prototypes have been created such that the prototype that's currently available
269
00:16:56,940 --> 00:17:00,780
is infinitely better than the prototype that first started.
270
00:17:00,780 --> 00:17:04,260
And so over time, prototyping helps you get better.
271
00:17:04,260 --> 00:17:08,180
So in a sense, rejection is about forward failure, if you allow it to be.
272
00:17:08,180 --> 00:17:12,920
If you allow the rejection to give you information that creates the next prototype, it allows
273
00:17:12,920 --> 00:17:16,300
you to just realize that what you're doing is prototyping.
274
00:17:16,300 --> 00:17:20,220
In your career as a clinician researcher, you're creating multiple prototypes.
275
00:17:20,220 --> 00:17:26,020
And usually, each prototype, each subsequent prototype, is better than the last prototype.
276
00:17:26,020 --> 00:17:30,460
And what's interesting is that you already know as you're creating a prototype how you
277
00:17:30,460 --> 00:17:31,740
can make it better.
278
00:17:31,740 --> 00:17:36,700
So let's say we submit a manuscript and we get reviews.
279
00:17:36,700 --> 00:17:40,500
Then the reviewers give us information about how the prototype could be made better.
280
00:17:40,500 --> 00:17:43,460
And we could agree with that, but we could disagree with that.
281
00:17:43,460 --> 00:17:45,400
But we have information.
282
00:17:45,400 --> 00:17:48,780
And so we take that information and we create the next prototype.
283
00:17:48,780 --> 00:17:54,180
And so think of rejection as failing forward because what you're doing is enhancing their
284
00:17:54,180 --> 00:17:58,140
prototype, is making the prototype better.
285
00:17:58,140 --> 00:18:00,540
And it really helps you create a better product.
286
00:18:00,540 --> 00:18:07,380
And I will say that I don't know a review that has not really enhanced my product.
287
00:18:07,380 --> 00:18:11,020
And I think a lot right now, I'm thinking about manuscripts where the reviewers were
288
00:18:11,020 --> 00:18:12,020
like, well, what if you did this?
289
00:18:12,020 --> 00:18:13,020
And what if you did that?
290
00:18:13,020 --> 00:18:15,020
And at first, we roll our eyes.
291
00:18:15,020 --> 00:18:18,260
We're like, this is ridiculous.
292
00:18:18,260 --> 00:18:22,760
When we come back, we're like, hmm, yeah, we can see how that might enhance the work.
293
00:18:22,760 --> 00:18:25,340
And when we respond, we get to respond in our own way.
294
00:18:25,340 --> 00:18:27,240
So we're not like, well, it's rare.
295
00:18:27,240 --> 00:18:28,240
It does happen.
296
00:18:28,240 --> 00:18:31,300
Sometimes reviewers will say, write this instead.
297
00:18:31,300 --> 00:18:36,340
But we get to use the information we see from the reviewers to create something that's so
298
00:18:36,340 --> 00:18:40,140
much better, to create something that's so much better.
299
00:18:40,140 --> 00:18:47,500
And so there's an opportunity to really continue to prototype in our work.
300
00:18:47,500 --> 00:18:53,260
And that helps us not think of it as a rejection, but really an opportunity to create a better
301
00:18:53,260 --> 00:18:54,940
prototype.
302
00:18:54,940 --> 00:18:56,900
And then number four is to have a plan.
303
00:18:56,900 --> 00:18:58,620
Okay, rejection is coming.
304
00:18:58,620 --> 00:19:00,820
If you didn't know that, I've just announced it to you.
305
00:19:00,820 --> 00:19:03,820
If you haven't experienced it yet, congratulations.
306
00:19:03,820 --> 00:19:05,540
Your first rejection is coming.
307
00:19:05,540 --> 00:19:07,660
And what are you going to do when it comes?
308
00:19:07,660 --> 00:19:09,060
Are you prepared?
309
00:19:09,060 --> 00:19:11,900
So how do you prepare for rejection?
310
00:19:11,900 --> 00:19:13,820
Well, you have a plan.
311
00:19:13,820 --> 00:19:18,300
When you go to submit something, if you're submitting a manuscript, for example, have
312
00:19:18,300 --> 00:19:20,580
a list of journals that you're submitting to.
313
00:19:20,580 --> 00:19:22,940
This is tier one of the journals we still want to submit to.
314
00:19:22,940 --> 00:19:24,660
This is tier two that we want to submit to.
315
00:19:24,660 --> 00:19:25,660
This is tier three.
316
00:19:25,660 --> 00:19:28,340
And if the journal doesn't get into one, then we're going to go with two.
317
00:19:28,340 --> 00:19:29,940
If it doesn't get into two, we're going to go with three.
318
00:19:29,940 --> 00:19:32,980
If it doesn't get into three, we're going to go with four.
319
00:19:32,980 --> 00:19:34,360
Start with a plan.
320
00:19:34,360 --> 00:19:39,380
And so there's already a plan of action when the manuscript is not accepted.
321
00:19:39,380 --> 00:19:42,020
You're not sitting down thinking, oh, what do we do now?
322
00:19:42,020 --> 00:19:44,820
Oh, my goodness, we didn't expect this rejection.
323
00:19:44,820 --> 00:19:48,140
Oh, no, we are stuck.
324
00:19:48,140 --> 00:19:49,140
You have a plan.
325
00:19:49,140 --> 00:19:52,740
You're like, oh, we didn't think this would happen, but we made a plan that we would go
326
00:19:52,740 --> 00:19:55,220
to manuscript two, tier two.
327
00:19:55,220 --> 00:20:00,420
And let's go ahead now revamp and resubmit to tier two journal.
328
00:20:00,420 --> 00:20:06,260
When you have a plan, it allows you not to get overwhelmed by the rejection because in
329
00:20:06,260 --> 00:20:10,500
a way you've kind of planned for it and you can execute on the plan.
330
00:20:10,500 --> 00:20:12,420
How about a grant rejection?
331
00:20:12,420 --> 00:20:18,380
Well, I hope that you're not basing your entire career on this one grant that you're submitting.
332
00:20:18,380 --> 00:20:22,580
I hope that you have taken this grant and thought about how you're going to repurpose
333
00:20:22,580 --> 00:20:23,660
it.
334
00:20:23,660 --> 00:20:27,580
But let's say you have a grant and it's like, oh, my gosh, this is the most amazing grant
335
00:20:27,580 --> 00:20:28,580
I've ever submitted.
336
00:20:28,580 --> 00:20:34,180
And you've got to have a plan for if that grant is not accepted, if that proposal is
337
00:20:34,180 --> 00:20:36,060
not funded, what's next?
338
00:20:36,060 --> 00:20:41,100
You can take the summary statements, you know, revise the proposal, where are you going to
339
00:20:41,100 --> 00:20:42,100
resubmit to?
340
00:20:42,100 --> 00:20:46,060
And it may be that you say, nope, this is the last time we're submitting this to this
341
00:20:46,060 --> 00:20:47,820
particular funder.
342
00:20:47,820 --> 00:20:52,500
And if it's rejected, then we're going to change the focus of the proposal so that it
343
00:20:52,500 --> 00:20:55,020
can match, it can better align with this other funder.
344
00:20:55,020 --> 00:20:57,340
And then we're going to go to this other funder.
345
00:20:57,340 --> 00:20:59,580
But you have a plan in place.
346
00:20:59,580 --> 00:21:05,260
And so it allows you to get away from the rejection that just paralyzes you for weeks
347
00:21:05,260 --> 00:21:07,260
and weeks or months and months.
348
00:21:07,260 --> 00:21:08,860
And you're like, whatever happened to that project?
349
00:21:08,860 --> 00:21:10,980
You're like, ah, we got rejected.
350
00:21:10,980 --> 00:21:16,380
But when you have a plan and after you've picked yourself up from the floor, you're
351
00:21:16,380 --> 00:21:20,460
like, OK, what did we say we were going to do if this rejection came?
352
00:21:20,460 --> 00:21:21,460
You have a plan.
353
00:21:21,460 --> 00:21:27,420
So for this particular grant I talked about, you know, we already had a plan to resubmit
354
00:21:27,420 --> 00:21:30,260
if it wasn't funded the first time.
355
00:21:30,260 --> 00:21:33,580
And we're in the process of talking about what does responding to the summary statement
356
00:21:33,580 --> 00:21:34,580
look like?
357
00:21:34,580 --> 00:21:35,580
What do we want to change?
358
00:21:35,580 --> 00:21:37,460
What do we want to keep?
359
00:21:37,460 --> 00:21:43,580
What ways do we enhance the project so that when it goes in the next time, it actually
360
00:21:43,580 --> 00:21:44,580
is fundable?
361
00:21:44,580 --> 00:21:49,540
So when you have a plan, it does allow you to fortify yourself against rejection.
362
00:21:49,540 --> 00:21:54,500
I think one thing that it's important to mention is have a support group.
363
00:21:54,500 --> 00:21:59,300
Have a group of people that you can come to and say, ah, this was rejected and I feel
364
00:21:59,300 --> 00:22:01,780
so awful about it and I'm so mad.
365
00:22:01,780 --> 00:22:06,260
I want to quit forever so they can help you put things in perspective.
366
00:22:06,260 --> 00:22:09,900
This journey is not a journey that you should go at alone.
367
00:22:09,900 --> 00:22:13,940
You should have accountability and you should have support as well.
368
00:22:13,940 --> 00:22:18,340
And sometimes your mentor is not the person to help you work through your feelings, your
369
00:22:18,340 --> 00:22:22,780
emotions about rejection because they are probably so far ahead they don't even think
370
00:22:22,780 --> 00:22:23,780
much about rejection.
371
00:22:23,780 --> 00:22:27,900
They're like, and get over it, but you can't get over it, not right away.
372
00:22:27,900 --> 00:22:31,940
You need people to come around you and say, you worked so hard and that was such a good
373
00:22:31,940 --> 00:22:34,500
paper and it's going to get published.
374
00:22:34,500 --> 00:22:35,500
Don't worry about it.
375
00:22:35,500 --> 00:22:38,580
You need a group of people to just enhance you.
376
00:22:38,580 --> 00:22:45,340
So if you're looking for a group, if you're looking for accountability, you can get that
377
00:22:45,340 --> 00:22:51,500
in our coaching programs, sign up at clinicianresearcherpodcast.com to get more information.
378
00:22:51,500 --> 00:22:56,820
If this podcast episode has been helpful to you, please leave us a review and help other
379
00:22:56,820 --> 00:22:58,820
people to find us as well.
380
00:22:58,820 --> 00:23:05,060
And better still, forward this to just one clinician researcher who needs to be encouraged
381
00:23:05,060 --> 00:23:06,060
in the face of rejection.
382
00:23:06,060 --> 00:23:09,060
It's been a pleasure talking with you today.
383
00:23:09,060 --> 00:23:10,060
Thank you for listening.
384
00:23:10,060 --> 00:23:19,700
I look forward to the next time.
385
00:23:19,700 --> 00:23:25,060
Thanks for listening to this episode of the Clinician Researcher Podcast, where academic
386
00:23:25,060 --> 00:23:30,260
clinicians learn the skills to build their own research program, whether or not they
387
00:23:30,260 --> 00:23:31,860
have a mentor.
388
00:23:31,860 --> 00:23:37,980
If you found the information in this episode to be helpful, don't keep it all to yourself.
389
00:23:37,980 --> 00:23:39,700
Someone else needs to hear it.
390
00:23:39,700 --> 00:23:43,760
So take a minute right now and share it.
391
00:23:43,760 --> 00:23:49,220
As you share this episode, you become part of our mission to help launch a new generation
392
00:23:49,220 --> 00:24:10,260
of clinician researchers who make transformative discoveries that change the way we do healthcare.
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:05,860
Welcome to the Clinician Researcher podcast, where academic clinicians learn the skills
2
00:00:05,860 --> 00:00:11,260
to build their own research program, whether or not they have a mentor.
3
00:00:11,260 --> 00:00:17,340
As clinicians, we spend a decade or more as trainees learning to take care of patients.
4
00:00:17,340 --> 00:00:22,380
When we finally start our careers, we want to build research programs, but then we find
5
00:00:22,380 --> 00:00:27,780
that our years of clinical training did not adequately prepare us to lead our research
6
00:00:27,780 --> 00:00:29,180
program.
7
00:00:29,180 --> 00:00:35,480
Through no fault of our own, we struggle to find mentors, and when we can't, we quit.
8
00:00:35,480 --> 00:00:40,580
However, clinicians hold the keys to the greatest research breakthroughs.
9
00:00:40,580 --> 00:00:46,200
For this reason, the Clinician Researcher podcast exists to give academic clinicians
10
00:00:46,200 --> 00:00:51,800
the tools to build their own research program, whether or not they have a mentor.
11
00:00:51,800 --> 00:01:01,180
Now introducing your host, Toyosi Onwuemene.
12
00:01:01,180 --> 00:01:04,100
Welcome to today's episode of the Clinician Researcher podcast.
13
00:01:04,100 --> 00:01:08,940
I'm your host, Toyosi Onwuemene, and it is a pleasure to be talking with you today.
14
00:01:08,940 --> 00:01:13,220
So today we're going to be talking about how to keep going in the face of rejection.
15
00:01:13,220 --> 00:01:14,220
Ugh, rejection.
16
00:01:14,220 --> 00:01:19,900
Yes, we're going to be talking about how to keep going in the face of rejection.
17
00:01:19,900 --> 00:01:24,060
And one thing I want to invite you to do is if you are interested, please sign up on our
18
00:01:24,060 --> 00:01:28,820
website for more information about our coaching programs.
19
00:01:28,820 --> 00:01:31,540
That is ClinicianResearcherpodcast.com.
20
00:01:31,540 --> 00:01:36,220
Academic Negotiation Academy will be enrolling its next cohort soon.
21
00:01:36,220 --> 00:01:40,460
Sign up to get on the wait list at ClinicianResearcherpodcast.com.
22
00:01:40,460 --> 00:01:42,260
All right.
23
00:01:42,260 --> 00:01:45,740
I am talking today about how to keep going in the face of rejection.
24
00:01:45,740 --> 00:01:51,460
And you know, I will tell you that no one prepared me for the rejection that was coming
25
00:01:51,460 --> 00:01:53,700
in academic medicine.
26
00:01:53,700 --> 00:01:55,980
And there is a ton of rejection.
27
00:01:55,980 --> 00:01:58,980
Oh my goodness, so much rejection.
28
00:01:58,980 --> 00:02:04,660
You get rejected in your grant submission to get rejected in your manuscript submissions.
29
00:02:04,660 --> 00:02:07,020
There's a lot of rejection.
30
00:02:07,020 --> 00:02:10,380
And many times that can feel very personal.
31
00:02:10,380 --> 00:02:14,780
And it's hard to separate yourself from all that rejection.
32
00:02:14,780 --> 00:02:19,340
So when I recently submitted a grant, I was so pumped about this grant.
33
00:02:19,340 --> 00:02:23,540
I mean, it was maybe one of the best applications I had ever written.
34
00:02:23,540 --> 00:02:25,140
We had time.
35
00:02:25,140 --> 00:02:29,780
I had submitted this application as an MPI application.
36
00:02:29,780 --> 00:02:32,980
So I had another PI who was equally invested.
37
00:02:32,980 --> 00:02:36,580
And it was just such a wonderful writing collaboration.
38
00:02:36,580 --> 00:02:42,340
The best grant I've ever written, just considering all the energy and just it was good.
39
00:02:42,340 --> 00:02:43,340
It was good grant.
40
00:02:43,340 --> 00:02:44,340
It was good.
41
00:02:44,340 --> 00:02:48,220
And so I was so sure that this grant would be funded.
42
00:02:48,220 --> 00:02:49,220
I was so sure.
43
00:02:49,220 --> 00:02:51,460
Like, no, grants are not to be funded the first time.
44
00:02:51,460 --> 00:02:53,100
It was like, this one's going to be.
45
00:02:53,100 --> 00:02:58,860
And even if it's not funded, it's going to score really, really well.
46
00:02:58,860 --> 00:03:00,900
And so imagine my surprise.
47
00:03:00,900 --> 00:03:05,420
And really, I was shocked when it came back as not discussed.
48
00:03:05,420 --> 00:03:06,420
Shock, shock.
49
00:03:06,420 --> 00:03:08,380
I mean, I don't know.
50
00:03:08,380 --> 00:03:10,380
You have enough grants that are not discussed.
51
00:03:10,380 --> 00:03:12,540
You're not really shocked, shocked anymore.
52
00:03:12,540 --> 00:03:14,620
It's like, oh, that happened again.
53
00:03:14,620 --> 00:03:16,100
But I was surprised at this one.
54
00:03:16,100 --> 00:03:19,420
And it did kind of it was like a sucker punch to the stomach.
55
00:03:19,420 --> 00:03:24,260
This one took me a little bit to think about to think about going back and looking at it.
56
00:03:24,260 --> 00:03:29,780
And actually, when you first find out that the grant is not discussed, you don't necessarily
57
00:03:29,780 --> 00:03:32,380
have the opportunity to go find out what the summary statements are.
58
00:03:32,380 --> 00:03:35,100
So it takes a couple of weeks.
59
00:03:35,100 --> 00:03:38,100
Anyway, it took a couple of weeks.
60
00:03:38,100 --> 00:03:42,540
And by then, you already know that the grant is not going to be funded.
61
00:03:42,540 --> 00:03:45,660
So by the time the summary statement comes, to some extent, you're prepared.
62
00:03:45,660 --> 00:03:49,260
But even then, you're still not prepared because you're like, I don't want to look at this.
63
00:03:49,260 --> 00:03:50,260
But I did look at it.
64
00:03:50,260 --> 00:03:54,540
And I will tell you, it is the first time I read a summary statement.
65
00:03:54,540 --> 00:03:58,500
And at the end of it, I was like, oh, OK, is that what you need?
66
00:03:58,500 --> 00:04:00,300
OK, bring it on.
67
00:04:00,300 --> 00:04:03,980
This is going to be good.
68
00:04:03,980 --> 00:04:06,340
It was just an opportunity.
69
00:04:06,340 --> 00:04:11,820
And at the end of it, I think why I was so pumped by reading that summary statement is
70
00:04:11,820 --> 00:04:14,100
that we wrote a grant we really wanted to do.
71
00:04:14,100 --> 00:04:17,100
We wrote a grant we were super excited about.
72
00:04:17,100 --> 00:04:19,260
And it was such a wonderful writing experience.
73
00:04:19,260 --> 00:04:23,780
And so to read the summary statement and realize that, you know what?
74
00:04:23,780 --> 00:04:26,160
This project is still pretty awesome.
75
00:04:26,160 --> 00:04:30,500
And these are the things that are recommended to get the project to funding.
76
00:04:30,500 --> 00:04:32,860
OK, we can do that.
77
00:04:32,860 --> 00:04:38,980
And it's just the sense of the value of the work is such that it's not going to stop.
78
00:04:38,980 --> 00:04:41,820
We're going to find a way to move it forward.
79
00:04:41,820 --> 00:04:45,500
We are going to find a way to move it forward because we are committed to the work, because
80
00:04:45,500 --> 00:04:50,540
the work is important and it needs to see the light of day.
81
00:04:50,540 --> 00:04:55,980
And it's just such a wonderful place to be, I think, from just the perspective of what
82
00:04:55,980 --> 00:04:58,260
are you writing that ignites your fire?
83
00:04:58,260 --> 00:05:02,420
What are you writing about that keeps you going?
84
00:05:02,420 --> 00:05:06,340
And I think that's probably what I'm talking about today is how do you keep going in the
85
00:05:06,340 --> 00:05:13,180
face of rejection and what are some of the ways that you can think about rejection and
86
00:05:13,180 --> 00:05:16,400
how do you rejection proof your experience?
87
00:05:16,400 --> 00:05:19,180
So I'm not saying I'm taking away rejections.
88
00:05:19,180 --> 00:05:25,580
I'm saying how do you take those rejections and make them into more than just rejection?
89
00:05:25,580 --> 00:05:30,580
So today I'm talking about four things to think about in fortifying yourself against
90
00:05:30,580 --> 00:05:31,580
rejection.
91
00:05:31,580 --> 00:05:38,060
So number one is start with a project.
92
00:05:38,060 --> 00:05:41,500
So there's a book by Simon Sinek that says start with why.
93
00:05:41,500 --> 00:05:45,860
And if I wasn't saying start with a project, I would say start with why.
94
00:05:45,860 --> 00:05:51,140
Many times when we are coming to our careers as clinician researchers, we are kind of starting
95
00:05:51,140 --> 00:05:54,700
off on the project that was handed to us.
96
00:05:54,700 --> 00:06:00,540
And there's value in that because, again, we are thinking about research training.
97
00:06:00,540 --> 00:06:02,780
It takes time to do research training.
98
00:06:02,780 --> 00:06:07,540
And over the course of PhD training, people start from where they were just contributing
99
00:06:07,540 --> 00:06:12,740
to a project to where they're actually taking pieces of projects and creating their own
100
00:06:12,740 --> 00:06:17,620
projects out of that to where they are actually leading their own projects.
101
00:06:17,620 --> 00:06:20,940
And so when you think about clinicians doing research, in a way, you're trying to fast
102
00:06:20,940 --> 00:06:23,340
track and accelerate the process.
103
00:06:23,340 --> 00:06:27,420
So you don't necessarily start out with your own project.
104
00:06:27,420 --> 00:06:31,580
You're looking to see is there a mentor who's already working on a project and I can get
105
00:06:31,580 --> 00:06:32,580
skills that I need.
106
00:06:32,580 --> 00:06:34,820
So there's definitely the elements of that.
107
00:06:34,820 --> 00:06:39,060
But as you start to think about leading your own research program, and I would argue that
108
00:06:39,060 --> 00:06:44,660
when you are a fellow making that transition, to really start thinking about what do I care
109
00:06:44,660 --> 00:06:45,660
about?
110
00:06:45,660 --> 00:06:47,940
What do I really, really care about?
111
00:06:47,940 --> 00:06:53,040
And to focus on getting involved in projects you really, really care about that you see
112
00:06:53,040 --> 00:06:58,140
yourself continue projects that really energize you.
113
00:06:58,140 --> 00:07:03,800
And it's important because there are two pieces I think about in making and doing the training
114
00:07:03,800 --> 00:07:09,860
or in making the transition from clinician to researcher to leader of a program is number
115
00:07:09,860 --> 00:07:15,780
one, you do need to learn how to do you need to learn techniques, but you learn how to
116
00:07:15,780 --> 00:07:21,740
do not so that you keep doing, but so that you are able to supervise people who do because
117
00:07:21,740 --> 00:07:27,920
as a clinician, you are a leader and your job ultimately is not to continue to do things
118
00:07:27,920 --> 00:07:28,920
for yourself.
119
00:07:28,920 --> 00:07:35,340
Your job ultimately is to lead people to do the work of your research program.
120
00:07:35,340 --> 00:07:40,780
And so it's important, I think, to separate the doing of the research from the leading
121
00:07:40,780 --> 00:07:41,780
of the research.
122
00:07:41,780 --> 00:07:43,860
So there are two components to the training.
123
00:07:43,860 --> 00:07:44,860
Number one is the doing.
124
00:07:44,860 --> 00:07:50,180
Number two is the leading of the doers because your job and actually maybe I would argue
125
00:07:50,180 --> 00:07:54,180
that you're leading the doers and ultimately you lead thinkers as well.
126
00:07:54,180 --> 00:08:00,580
Your value to your research program leadership is your thought, is the way you think.
127
00:08:00,580 --> 00:08:06,460
This is how we can take this huge complex problem and boil it down into a research question
128
00:08:06,460 --> 00:08:07,460
that can be answered.
129
00:08:07,460 --> 00:08:12,280
And these are the set of experiments that allow us to answer the question, or these
130
00:08:12,280 --> 00:08:16,400
are the set of analyses that allow us to answer the question.
131
00:08:16,400 --> 00:08:23,220
And then you get your team to do the analyses to answer the question, or to do the experiments
132
00:08:23,220 --> 00:08:24,860
that answer the question.
133
00:08:24,860 --> 00:08:28,220
Your thought leadership is so key.
134
00:08:28,220 --> 00:08:36,460
And so when you are thinking about your experiences for training, think about how do I get the
135
00:08:36,460 --> 00:08:38,180
thought leadership?
136
00:08:38,180 --> 00:08:41,580
How do I get the thought patterns that allow me to do this well?
137
00:08:41,580 --> 00:08:46,140
And so you think about your projects in terms of what skill is this bringing me?
138
00:08:46,140 --> 00:08:52,380
Is it giving me the skill to do, which is fine, but ultimately the goal is not to get
139
00:08:52,380 --> 00:08:57,260
good at doing, your goal is to get good at leading the people who do.
140
00:08:57,260 --> 00:09:01,980
And you get good at leading the people who do things by being able to think well.
141
00:09:01,980 --> 00:09:06,460
And so yes, sometimes it's like, well, but I have to teach the people who do things.
142
00:09:06,460 --> 00:09:12,060
I would say that think about how do you structure your research programs such that you're working
143
00:09:12,060 --> 00:09:15,220
with people who already know how to do these things.
144
00:09:15,220 --> 00:09:18,860
And sometimes that is about collaborations as well.
145
00:09:18,860 --> 00:09:22,100
Who already has the infrastructure to do what you want to do?
146
00:09:22,100 --> 00:09:26,740
And how can you collaborate with them so that your group can focus on what their area of
147
00:09:26,740 --> 00:09:33,220
expertise is, and you're not necessarily investing all the time trying to learn new techniques
148
00:09:33,220 --> 00:09:34,220
each time.
149
00:09:34,220 --> 00:09:37,980
Anyway, so there are nuances depending on the field of research that you're in.
150
00:09:37,980 --> 00:09:42,380
But you do want to really love what you do.
151
00:09:42,380 --> 00:09:45,200
You want to be invested in the patient population.
152
00:09:45,200 --> 00:09:50,860
You want to know that this work leads to something meaningful to you.
153
00:09:50,860 --> 00:09:53,620
And for different people, that means different things.
154
00:09:53,620 --> 00:09:55,820
So for me, I'm not a basic scientist.
155
00:09:55,820 --> 00:09:58,460
I don't work in a wet lab.
156
00:09:58,460 --> 00:10:04,620
I lead a research team that includes biostatisticians and data analysts.
157
00:10:04,620 --> 00:10:09,900
And we do different work from someone who say at them at the bench.
158
00:10:09,900 --> 00:10:15,740
So maybe taking an example from the bench and thinking about, OK, maybe this person
159
00:10:15,740 --> 00:10:19,580
is doing receptor signaling and this work is so important to them.
160
00:10:19,580 --> 00:10:22,740
And they're like, this receptor signaling work that I'm doing is going to really help
161
00:10:22,740 --> 00:10:27,100
us solve problems in patients who have a certain type of cancer.
162
00:10:27,100 --> 00:10:28,460
And that's their why.
163
00:10:28,460 --> 00:10:31,460
It's like this cancer needs to be cured.
164
00:10:31,460 --> 00:10:34,780
Receptor signaling research allows me to do that.
165
00:10:34,780 --> 00:10:38,940
And it allows me to contribute in this way.
166
00:10:38,940 --> 00:10:44,860
And so for that reason, the research project that they're doing is not about receptors.
167
00:10:44,860 --> 00:10:46,460
It's not about signaling.
168
00:10:46,460 --> 00:10:50,140
It's about the patient at the end that's going to benefit from what is coming out of this
169
00:10:50,140 --> 00:10:51,140
work.
170
00:10:51,140 --> 00:10:52,140
And that's great.
171
00:10:52,140 --> 00:10:53,500
I wouldn't resonate with that.
172
00:10:53,500 --> 00:11:02,000
I resonate with how do we answer clinical questions using big data so that we can have
173
00:11:02,000 --> 00:11:04,020
insights to help many more patients?
174
00:11:04,020 --> 00:11:06,980
I want to be a little bit closer to the patient's population.
175
00:11:06,980 --> 00:11:14,060
And for that reason, the population of patients in whom I am asking questions is so important.
176
00:11:14,060 --> 00:11:19,300
And so you want to make sure that you actually enjoy what you do or that the why is so clear
177
00:11:19,300 --> 00:11:25,820
to you because you know that the work you're doing will be done whether people pay you
178
00:11:25,820 --> 00:11:27,260
to do it or not.
179
00:11:27,260 --> 00:11:29,260
You want to do this work.
180
00:11:29,260 --> 00:11:31,860
In fact, if you could, you would pay to do the work.
181
00:11:31,860 --> 00:11:38,420
And for that reason, you want to make sure that you're doing work that matters so that
182
00:11:38,420 --> 00:11:41,460
when rejection comes, you keep it in perspective.
183
00:11:41,460 --> 00:11:45,220
It's like, okay, it's one rejection, but this work is so important, it still needs to move
184
00:11:45,220 --> 00:11:46,220
forward.
185
00:11:46,220 --> 00:11:49,180
And you don't let rejection stop you from doing the work.
186
00:11:49,180 --> 00:11:52,900
What happens when you do work that you don't care about or work that other people have
187
00:11:52,900 --> 00:11:57,620
asked you to do and you've kind of taken on as your own is that the moment rejection comes,
188
00:11:57,620 --> 00:11:58,620
you're like, you know what?
189
00:11:58,620 --> 00:11:59,620
This sucks.
190
00:11:59,620 --> 00:12:00,620
I quit.
191
00:12:00,620 --> 00:12:01,620
I'm done with this.
192
00:12:01,620 --> 00:12:05,980
And so, you know, when it's work that you value, it's a patient population you absolutely
193
00:12:05,980 --> 00:12:12,540
want to contribute to no matter what, you don't let the rejection stop you in your tracks.
194
00:12:12,540 --> 00:12:15,580
You think about a different way to deal with it.
195
00:12:15,580 --> 00:12:17,340
And so anyway, it starts with why.
196
00:12:17,340 --> 00:12:21,820
It starts with really thinking about the reason for which you're doing the research.
197
00:12:21,820 --> 00:12:26,460
Number two is to reframe the way you think about rejection.
198
00:12:26,460 --> 00:12:33,540
Now, when you say rejection, it just sounds so bad, but what if we thought about rejection
199
00:12:33,540 --> 00:12:36,540
as the failure of a prototype?
200
00:12:36,540 --> 00:12:41,860
We've created a prototype and we've put it out there into the world and someone said,
201
00:12:41,860 --> 00:12:43,700
I don't like this prototype.
202
00:12:43,700 --> 00:12:49,980
Now, all the work that you have put into this prototype is still valuable.
203
00:12:49,980 --> 00:12:56,420
All the experience you had in creating this prototype is still valuable.
204
00:12:56,420 --> 00:12:57,420
You haven't lost any of it.
205
00:12:57,420 --> 00:13:02,820
But what you're going to do is take the prototype, keep the stuff in the prototype that makes
206
00:13:02,820 --> 00:13:06,460
sense and then create the next prototype.
207
00:13:06,460 --> 00:13:15,860
And so when you have something that is rejected, it's rejected right now in its current format,
208
00:13:15,860 --> 00:13:22,300
but how can it be recreated so that it becomes something greater?
209
00:13:22,300 --> 00:13:28,060
For example, you just submitted a grant that was rejected and if you're lucky, if you're
210
00:13:28,060 --> 00:13:31,780
submitting to NIH, you get a summary statement that tells you these are all the things that
211
00:13:31,780 --> 00:13:34,780
we think could be improved about your grant.
212
00:13:34,780 --> 00:13:39,220
Now you never are starting from scratch when you resubmit the grant because there's a lot
213
00:13:39,220 --> 00:13:42,780
of it that's already written and a lot of components that don't necessarily need to
214
00:13:42,780 --> 00:13:46,100
change and then there are components that are going to change.
215
00:13:46,100 --> 00:13:50,460
And even if you're doing an overhaul, there's still a starting point.
216
00:13:50,460 --> 00:13:52,900
You're not starting from a blank page.
217
00:13:52,900 --> 00:13:58,900
And so at the end, if we reframe the way we think about rejection, instead as well, well,
218
00:13:58,900 --> 00:14:04,420
this thing was not acceptable in its current format to somebody else.
219
00:14:04,420 --> 00:14:07,660
You can think about who else might accept it in its current format.
220
00:14:07,660 --> 00:14:10,860
So is there a different audience that might like it?
221
00:14:10,860 --> 00:14:18,620
Or you can think about how do we reformat this thing so that it is now acceptable to
222
00:14:18,620 --> 00:14:21,100
the people that we're sending it to?
223
00:14:21,100 --> 00:14:27,300
And so what you find is over time, rejection of one thing allows you to recreate it in
224
00:14:27,300 --> 00:14:30,740
a way that's now acceptable the second time around.
225
00:14:30,740 --> 00:14:38,460
And so rejection really is a personal thing, or we can make it personal, but really it's
226
00:14:38,460 --> 00:14:41,420
just the prototype was rejected.
227
00:14:41,420 --> 00:14:44,060
This thing that you created was rejected.
228
00:14:44,060 --> 00:14:49,860
How can you recreate it so that it's now acceptable to the people that you're putting out there
229
00:14:49,860 --> 00:14:50,860
to?
230
00:14:50,860 --> 00:14:55,020
So it's either the funders or it's the reviewers on behalf of the funders or the reviewers
231
00:14:55,020 --> 00:14:57,820
on behalf of the journal.
232
00:14:57,820 --> 00:15:00,420
But let's rethink the way we think about rejection.
233
00:15:00,420 --> 00:15:01,660
So it's not personal.
234
00:15:01,660 --> 00:15:07,420
It's not being rejected me, but it's really clearly, okay, they didn't like this prototype.
235
00:15:07,420 --> 00:15:08,420
What do we do about it?
236
00:15:08,420 --> 00:15:14,140
And that's why number three is really thinking about creating multiple prototypes.
237
00:15:14,140 --> 00:15:20,780
So it's like, okay, if you're creating something, you know that the very, very first version
238
00:15:20,780 --> 00:15:22,740
is usually not the best version.
239
00:15:22,740 --> 00:15:27,380
It's very rare that you create something that's the final version.
240
00:15:27,380 --> 00:15:29,540
I have submitted many manuscripts in my lifetime.
241
00:15:29,540 --> 00:15:32,700
Goodness, I feel like that number is at least close to 100.
242
00:15:32,700 --> 00:15:37,780
I mean, I haven't had 100 published, not right now, not at the time of this recording, but
243
00:15:37,780 --> 00:15:40,180
I've submitted a lot.
244
00:15:40,180 --> 00:15:44,580
And sometimes it's resubmitting the same thing across, you know, in different versions across
245
00:15:44,580 --> 00:15:46,500
different platforms.
246
00:15:46,500 --> 00:15:51,820
But ultimately, the first thing is usually not the first thing that's accepted.
247
00:15:51,820 --> 00:15:53,740
I've had one, yes, that's what I was saying.
248
00:15:53,740 --> 00:15:58,260
I was trying to say that I've submitted many things and I've only ever had one manuscript
249
00:15:58,260 --> 00:15:59,660
that was accepted the first time.
250
00:15:59,660 --> 00:16:01,060
And that was a complete shock.
251
00:16:01,060 --> 00:16:03,060
I was like, what?
252
00:16:03,060 --> 00:16:05,460
And in reality, it wasn't the first draft that we submitted.
253
00:16:05,460 --> 00:16:07,580
I mean, this is work that we've been doing for a long time.
254
00:16:07,580 --> 00:16:11,540
We were proud of our work, but we also expected that the reviewers would come back with things
255
00:16:11,540 --> 00:16:12,540
that we needed to change.
256
00:16:12,540 --> 00:16:14,460
So we were surprised it was accepted the first time.
257
00:16:14,460 --> 00:16:16,900
That rarely happens.
258
00:16:16,900 --> 00:16:21,780
But each time you submit, it's one version, right?
259
00:16:21,780 --> 00:16:24,180
And it's not even the version you started with.
260
00:16:24,180 --> 00:16:29,980
And if you get rejection, then you recreate and you resubmit.
261
00:16:29,980 --> 00:16:33,340
So ultimately, you're creating multiple prototypes of the same product.
262
00:16:33,340 --> 00:16:38,380
And each time you create a subsequent prototype, the prototype actually gets better.
263
00:16:38,380 --> 00:16:42,060
And if you think about it, let's think about the iPhone, for example, as an example of
264
00:16:42,060 --> 00:16:43,060
a phone.
265
00:16:43,060 --> 00:16:44,500
This is not a promotion.
266
00:16:44,500 --> 00:16:49,060
But if you go back to the very first iPhone and we still have the very first iPhone, I
267
00:16:49,060 --> 00:16:51,900
mean, it was really cool for its time.
268
00:16:51,900 --> 00:16:56,940
But multiple prototypes have been created such that the prototype that's currently available
269
00:16:56,940 --> 00:17:00,780
is infinitely better than the prototype that first started.
270
00:17:00,780 --> 00:17:04,260
And so over time, prototyping helps you get better.
271
00:17:04,260 --> 00:17:08,180
So in a sense, rejection is about forward failure, if you allow it to be.
272
00:17:08,180 --> 00:17:12,920
If you allow the rejection to give you information that creates the next prototype, it allows
273
00:17:12,920 --> 00:17:16,300
you to just realize that what you're doing is prototyping.
274
00:17:16,300 --> 00:17:20,220
In your career as a clinician researcher, you're creating multiple prototypes.
275
00:17:20,220 --> 00:17:26,020
And usually, each prototype, each subsequent prototype, is better than the last prototype.
276
00:17:26,020 --> 00:17:30,460
And what's interesting is that you already know as you're creating a prototype how you
277
00:17:30,460 --> 00:17:31,740
can make it better.
278
00:17:31,740 --> 00:17:36,700
So let's say we submit a manuscript and we get reviews.
279
00:17:36,700 --> 00:17:40,500
Then the reviewers give us information about how the prototype could be made better.
280
00:17:40,500 --> 00:17:43,460
And we could agree with that, but we could disagree with that.
281
00:17:43,460 --> 00:17:45,400
But we have information.
282
00:17:45,400 --> 00:17:48,780
And so we take that information and we create the next prototype.
283
00:17:48,780 --> 00:17:54,180
And so think of rejection as failing forward because what you're doing is enhancing their
284
00:17:54,180 --> 00:17:58,140
prototype, is making the prototype better.
285
00:17:58,140 --> 00:18:00,540
And it really helps you create a better product.
286
00:18:00,540 --> 00:18:07,380
And I will say that I don't know a review that has not really enhanced my product.
287
00:18:07,380 --> 00:18:11,020
And I think a lot right now, I'm thinking about manuscripts where the reviewers were
288
00:18:11,020 --> 00:18:12,020
like, well, what if you did this?
289
00:18:12,020 --> 00:18:13,020
And what if you did that?
290
00:18:13,020 --> 00:18:15,020
And at first, we roll our eyes.
291
00:18:15,020 --> 00:18:18,260
We're like, this is ridiculous.
292
00:18:18,260 --> 00:18:22,760
When we come back, we're like, hmm, yeah, we can see how that might enhance the work.
293
00:18:22,760 --> 00:18:25,340
And when we respond, we get to respond in our own way.
294
00:18:25,340 --> 00:18:27,240
So we're not like, well, it's rare.
295
00:18:27,240 --> 00:18:28,240
It does happen.
296
00:18:28,240 --> 00:18:31,300
Sometimes reviewers will say, write this instead.
297
00:18:31,300 --> 00:18:36,340
But we get to use the information we see from the reviewers to create something that's so
298
00:18:36,340 --> 00:18:40,140
much better, to create something that's so much better.
299
00:18:40,140 --> 00:18:47,500
And so there's an opportunity to really continue to prototype in our work.
300
00:18:47,500 --> 00:18:53,260
And that helps us not think of it as a rejection, but really an opportunity to create a better
301
00:18:53,260 --> 00:18:54,940
prototype.
302
00:18:54,940 --> 00:18:56,900
And then number four is to have a plan.
303
00:18:56,900 --> 00:18:58,620
Okay, rejection is coming.
304
00:18:58,620 --> 00:19:00,820
If you didn't know that, I've just announced it to you.
305
00:19:00,820 --> 00:19:03,820
If you haven't experienced it yet, congratulations.
306
00:19:03,820 --> 00:19:05,540
Your first rejection is coming.
307
00:19:05,540 --> 00:19:07,660
And what are you going to do when it comes?
308
00:19:07,660 --> 00:19:09,060
Are you prepared?
309
00:19:09,060 --> 00:19:11,900
So how do you prepare for rejection?
310
00:19:11,900 --> 00:19:13,820
Well, you have a plan.
311
00:19:13,820 --> 00:19:18,300
When you go to submit something, if you're submitting a manuscript, for example, have
312
00:19:18,300 --> 00:19:20,580
a list of journals that you're submitting to.
313
00:19:20,580 --> 00:19:22,940
This is tier one of the journals we still want to submit to.
314
00:19:22,940 --> 00:19:24,660
This is tier two that we want to submit to.
315
00:19:24,660 --> 00:19:25,660
This is tier three.
316
00:19:25,660 --> 00:19:28,340
And if the journal doesn't get into one, then we're going to go with two.
317
00:19:28,340 --> 00:19:29,940
If it doesn't get into two, we're going to go with three.
318
00:19:29,940 --> 00:19:32,980
If it doesn't get into three, we're going to go with four.
319
00:19:32,980 --> 00:19:34,360
Start with a plan.
320
00:19:34,360 --> 00:19:39,380
And so there's already a plan of action when the manuscript is not accepted.
321
00:19:39,380 --> 00:19:42,020
You're not sitting down thinking, oh, what do we do now?
322
00:19:42,020 --> 00:19:44,820
Oh, my goodness, we didn't expect this rejection.
323
00:19:44,820 --> 00:19:48,140
Oh, no, we are stuck.
324
00:19:48,140 --> 00:19:49,140
You have a plan.
325
00:19:49,140 --> 00:19:52,740
You're like, oh, we didn't think this would happen, but we made a plan that we would go
326
00:19:52,740 --> 00:19:55,220
to manuscript two, tier two.
327
00:19:55,220 --> 00:20:00,420
And let's go ahead now revamp and resubmit to tier two journal.
328
00:20:00,420 --> 00:20:06,260
When you have a plan, it allows you not to get overwhelmed by the rejection because in
329
00:20:06,260 --> 00:20:10,500
a way you've kind of planned for it and you can execute on the plan.
330
00:20:10,500 --> 00:20:12,420
How about a grant rejection?
331
00:20:12,420 --> 00:20:18,380
Well, I hope that you're not basing your entire career on this one grant that you're submitting.
332
00:20:18,380 --> 00:20:22,580
I hope that you have taken this grant and thought about how you're going to repurpose
333
00:20:22,580 --> 00:20:23,660
it.
334
00:20:23,660 --> 00:20:27,580
But let's say you have a grant and it's like, oh, my gosh, this is the most amazing grant
335
00:20:27,580 --> 00:20:28,580
I've ever submitted.
336
00:20:28,580 --> 00:20:34,180
And you've got to have a plan for if that grant is not accepted, if that proposal is
337
00:20:34,180 --> 00:20:36,060
not funded, what's next?
338
00:20:36,060 --> 00:20:41,100
You can take the summary statements, you know, revise the proposal, where are you going to
339
00:20:41,100 --> 00:20:42,100
resubmit to?
340
00:20:42,100 --> 00:20:46,060
And it may be that you say, nope, this is the last time we're submitting this to this
341
00:20:46,060 --> 00:20:47,820
particular funder.
342
00:20:47,820 --> 00:20:52,500
And if it's rejected, then we're going to change the focus of the proposal so that it
343
00:20:52,500 --> 00:20:55,020
can match, it can better align with this other funder.
344
00:20:55,020 --> 00:20:57,340
And then we're going to go to this other funder.
345
00:20:57,340 --> 00:20:59,580
But you have a plan in place.
346
00:20:59,580 --> 00:21:05,260
And so it allows you to get away from the rejection that just paralyzes you for weeks
347
00:21:05,260 --> 00:21:07,260
and weeks or months and months.
348
00:21:07,260 --> 00:21:08,860
And you're like, whatever happened to that project?
349
00:21:08,860 --> 00:21:10,980
You're like, ah, we got rejected.
350
00:21:10,980 --> 00:21:16,380
But when you have a plan and after you've picked yourself up from the floor, you're
351
00:21:16,380 --> 00:21:20,460
like, OK, what did we say we were going to do if this rejection came?
352
00:21:20,460 --> 00:21:21,460
You have a plan.
353
00:21:21,460 --> 00:21:27,420
So for this particular grant I talked about, you know, we already had a plan to resubmit
354
00:21:27,420 --> 00:21:30,260
if it wasn't funded the first time.
355
00:21:30,260 --> 00:21:33,580
And we're in the process of talking about what does responding to the summary statement
356
00:21:33,580 --> 00:21:34,580
look like?
357
00:21:34,580 --> 00:21:35,580
What do we want to change?
358
00:21:35,580 --> 00:21:37,460
What do we want to keep?
359
00:21:37,460 --> 00:21:43,580
What ways do we enhance the project so that when it goes in the next time, it actually
360
00:21:43,580 --> 00:21:44,580
is fundable?
361
00:21:44,580 --> 00:21:49,540
So when you have a plan, it does allow you to fortify yourself against rejection.
362
00:21:49,540 --> 00:21:54,500
I think one thing that it's important to mention is have a support group.
363
00:21:54,500 --> 00:21:59,300
Have a group of people that you can come to and say, ah, this was rejected and I feel
364
00:21:59,300 --> 00:22:01,780
so awful about it and I'm so mad.
365
00:22:01,780 --> 00:22:06,260
I want to quit forever so they can help you put things in perspective.
366
00:22:06,260 --> 00:22:09,900
This journey is not a journey that you should go at alone.
367
00:22:09,900 --> 00:22:13,940
You should have accountability and you should have support as well.
368
00:22:13,940 --> 00:22:18,340
And sometimes your mentor is not the person to help you work through your feelings, your
369
00:22:18,340 --> 00:22:22,780
emotions about rejection because they are probably so far ahead they don't even think
370
00:22:22,780 --> 00:22:23,780
much about rejection.
371
00:22:23,780 --> 00:22:27,900
They're like, and get over it, but you can't get over it, not right away.
372
00:22:27,900 --> 00:22:31,940
You need people to come around you and say, you worked so hard and that was such a good
373
00:22:31,940 --> 00:22:34,500
paper and it's going to get published.
374
00:22:34,500 --> 00:22:35,500
Don't worry about it.
375
00:22:35,500 --> 00:22:38,580
You need a group of people to just enhance you.
376
00:22:38,580 --> 00:22:45,340
So if you're looking for a group, if you're looking for accountability, you can get that
377
00:22:45,340 --> 00:22:51,500
in our coaching programs, sign up at clinicianresearcherpodcast.com to get more information.
378
00:22:51,500 --> 00:22:56,820
If this podcast episode has been helpful to you, please leave us a review and help other
379
00:22:56,820 --> 00:22:58,820
people to find us as well.
380
00:22:58,820 --> 00:23:05,060
And better still, forward this to just one clinician researcher who needs to be encouraged
381
00:23:05,060 --> 00:23:06,060
in the face of rejection.
382
00:23:06,060 --> 00:23:09,060
It's been a pleasure talking with you today.
383
00:23:09,060 --> 00:23:10,060
Thank you for listening.
384
00:23:10,060 --> 00:23:19,700
I look forward to the next time.
385
00:23:19,700 --> 00:23:25,060
Thanks for listening to this episode of the Clinician Researcher Podcast, where academic
386
00:23:25,060 --> 00:23:30,260
clinicians learn the skills to build their own research program, whether or not they
387
00:23:30,260 --> 00:23:31,860
have a mentor.
388
00:23:31,860 --> 00:23:37,980
If you found the information in this episode to be helpful, don't keep it all to yourself.
389
00:23:37,980 --> 00:23:39,700
Someone else needs to hear it.
390
00:23:39,700 --> 00:23:43,760
So take a minute right now and share it.
391
00:23:43,760 --> 00:23:49,220
As you share this episode, you become part of our mission to help launch a new generation
392
00:23:49,220 --> 00:24:10,260
of clinician researchers who make transformative discoveries that change the way we do healthcare.
